Taxes

[tax-rate-upload]

No, The Rich Do Not Pay ‘All The Taxes’

by: @ Business Insider
CNBC ran a story yesterday with the headline “The rich do not pay the most taxes, they pay ALL the taxes.”

The story has thousands of Facebook shares. And its premise is completely false.2013 tax distribution

The article goes on to present data regarding the federal personal income tax, which is indeed paid almost entirely by people with high incomes. People with low incomes pay negative federal personal income taxes (that is, the government sends them checks) because of the earned income tax credit.

But “taxes” are not the same thing as “federal personal income taxes.” The federal personal income tax only made up 28% of all U.S. government tax collections in 2012. Federal, state and local governments collected $4 trillion in taxes last year; just $1.1 trillion of that was federal personal income tax.

And people with low incomes who don’t pay federal personal income tax do pay lots of those other taxes: payroll tax, state income tax, sales tax, property tax, excise taxes, and more. They pay other taxes indirectly: Workers bear the burden of employer-paid payroll taxes and part of the burden of corporate income taxes.

Here’s a chart I made earlier this year showing the distribution of the tax burden when you add all the taxes together. Earners in the top 1% pay about 43% of their incomes in tax. People in the middle quintile pay 25%. The poorest fifth pays 13%.

Read more: Business Insider

Supreme Court refuses challenge by online retailers to N.Y. tax law

By Jim Puzzanghera and David G. Savage
WASHINGTON — Amazon.com Inc. and other online retailers suffered a legal setback on Cyber Monday as the Supreme Court turned away their challenge to a New York law that requires Internet companies to collect sales taxes.
Delivered on one of the year’s busiest online shopping days, the court’s decision is expected to accelerate the

sup_court

          US Supreme Court Justices (12/2013)

move by states to try to capture the taxes due on online purchases made by their residents.
The court’s refusal to take up the issue also increases pressure on Congress to settle the long-standing dispute between online and conventional bricks-and-mortar retailers and to enact legislation standardizing online sales tax collection.

“We have a patchwork of out-of-date laws,” said David C. Blum, a Chicago tax attorney uninvolved in the case but who has represented online retailers. “They may have made sense in the era before the Internet, but not now.”

The pioneering New York statute has become a model for efforts by California and other states to capture tax revenue. Today, 34 states by law or administrative process require at least major online retailers to collect sales taxes.

States said they lose more than $23 billion a year in revenue when people buy products online and fail to pay the required sales tax. Conventional retailers complain that they are at a competitive disadvantage because they must collect those taxes on each sale.

Some states have been passing laws that stretch their ability to force online retailers to collect sales taxes. The pressure of those laws helped California and Texas strike deals with major Internet retailers such as Amazon to collect sales taxes so they could locate distribution centers and other facilities there.

New York’s 2008 statute requires out-of-state Internet retailers to collect sales taxes if they used affiliates in the state to direct business to their websites, such as a museum website that directed people to Amazon to buy books.

The law treated these Web affiliates as though they were a sales force within the state. The U.S. Constitution always has allowed states to collect taxes from out-of-state companies if they have employees or offices — a nexus — physically located within a state.

Amazon and Overstock.com Inc. appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the New York law was unconstitutional.

The companies cited a 1992 Supreme Court decision involving mail-order catalogs. In that case, the court said states could collect sales taxes from retailers only when they have a physical presence in the state.

courtLawyers for Amazon and Overstock had argued that their dealings with other Web affiliates in New York did not constitute having a physical presence there. Citing similar laws in California, Connecticut, Illinois and North Carolina, the companies also said the New York law has “provided a road map for other state legislatures to enact similarly burdensome legislation.”

In Monday’s brief order, the high court turned down the appeals of Amazon and Overstock without comment, a decision that has the effect of upholding New York’s law.

“Bricks-and-mortar [stores] won,” said Bill Dombrowski, president of the California Retailers Assn. “The court has decided that states have the right to pass what New York passed.”

But even if the New York law had been overturned, California’s statute would have remained largely in force, experts said.

Like New York, California established nexus for making out-of-state retailers collect sales taxes. But California also created a basis for sales tax collection if a company had even a minor physical presence in the state.

Amazon, based in Seattle, not only has affiliates in California, but operates a research facility for its Kindle e-reader and has a subsidiary, the Independent Movie Database, located in the Golden State.

Since passage of California’s law in 2011, Amazon’s physical presence in California has ballooned as part of an agreement the company made with Gov. Jerry Brown. Amazon now operates three giant distribution centers — in San Bernardino, Tracy and Patterson — and probably will open more facilities as it moves toward same-day delivery service statewide.

California tax collectors recently reported that the new law generated $263.4 million in new revenue for the state treasury and local governments for the fiscal year ended June 30.

Retailers and state officials now are expected to ramp up efforts to get Congress to adopt a nationwide rule for online sales taxes. The National Conference of State Legislatures said it would send about 200 legislators, in town for an annual forum, to Capitol Hill on Wednesday to lobby for legislation.

Because it has the power to regulate interstate commerce, Congress can pass a law that allows states to force all retailers to collect sales taxes for purchases made by state residents.
Published from the Los Angeles Times

 

Vipshop shares moved sharply higher following third quarter financial results, but traders will be watching these key levels ahead. [...]
Thu, Nov 15, 2018 3:48:00 PM, Continue reading at the source
Shares of the auto parts stores could represent a long-term buying opportunity given revenue and EPS growth alongside accumulation signals. [...]
Thu, Nov 15, 2018 2:58:00 PM, Continue reading at the source
Netflix stock sold off more than 150 points into late October and has now competed the right shoulder of a head and shoulders top. [...]
Thu, Nov 15, 2018 2:32:00 PM, Continue reading at the source
We likely need to see breadth improvements and a retest of lows to signal that the market has begun to repair itself through time. [...]
Thu, Nov 15, 2018 1:44:00 PM, Continue reading at the source
Applied Materials appears to be "too cheap to ignore" with a P/E ratio of just 5.59 and a dividend yield of 2.39%. [...]
Thu, Nov 15, 2018 1:18:00 PM, Continue reading at the source
Homeowners in these areas will need to get used to flooding year after year. View Entire Post › [...]
Thu, Nov 15, 2018 8:25:00 AM, Continue reading at the source
%d bloggers like this: